<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>selophane.blog &#187; VA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.selophane.com/index.php/category/va/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.selophane.com</link>
	<description>Musings of an Architect</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 20:43:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fairfax Circle</title>
		<link>http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2009/10/30/fairfax-circle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2009/10/30/fairfax-circle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spencer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selophane.com/?p=972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Image via The Library of Virginia.] There has been a number of posts recently online decrying planning moves by Fairfax City that have been seen as anti-pedestrian and pro-vehicle. I believe that Fairfax Circle is the perfect place for Fairfax to make some planning changes that can be both car and pedestrian friendly. As a [...]<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.selophane.com/blog">selophane.blog</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2009/10/30/fairfax-circle/">Fairfax Circle</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2009/10/30/fairfax-circle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
