<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>selophane.blog &#187; Adpative Reuse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.selophane.com/index.php/tag/adpative-reuse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.selophane.com</link>
	<description>Musings of an Architect</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:04:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Adaptively reused Circuit Cities, here we come!</title>
		<link>http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2008/11/17/adaptively-reused-circuit-cities-here-we-come/</link>
		<comments>http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2008/11/17/adaptively-reused-circuit-cities-here-we-come/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 05:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spencer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architectural thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Orleans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adpative Reuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selophane.com/blog/?p=388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the recent closing of many of the area&#8217;s Circuit City stores and the bleak financial forecast, this Sunday&#8217;s Washington Post article about what to do with big box stores after they close down, seemed to be fortuitously timed to impact the local planning discourse. For this article, the Post assembled a collection of local architects and artists, such as Darrel Rippeteau, Roger K. Lewis, Esocoff &#38; Associates, et al., and asked them how they would reuse a big-box store. The graphics in this article are intriguing and open an sub/urban planning discussion on what to do with the trappings of early twenty-first century American development once this business model has changed. The proposals include luxury housing, gardens, vineyards, and other adaptive reuse measures. This is all green and good, but I have to question the safety and cost of reusing these big box stores. Like fast food franchises, big box stores are not built to last. They are not constructed with any concept of their permanence, instead they are meant to go up quick and cheap and come down the same way when the new mega-ultra-super mart opens around the corner. The advantage of reusing old warehouses and factories <a href='http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2008/11/17/adaptively-reused-circuit-cities-here-we-come/'>[...]</a><p>Post from: <a href="http://www.selophane.com/blog">selophane.blog</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2008/11/17/adaptively-reused-circuit-cities-here-we-come/">Adaptively reused Circuit Cities, here we come!</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2008/11/17/adaptively-reused-circuit-cities-here-we-come/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

