<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>selophane.blog &#187; Preservation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.selophane.com/index.php/tag/preservation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.selophane.com</link>
	<description>Musings of an Architect</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 19:04:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Heaven in 3 and half rooms</title>
		<link>http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2011/01/19/heaven-in-3-and-half-rooms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2011/01/19/heaven-in-3-and-half-rooms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spencer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architectural thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Lloyd Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Houses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preservation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selophane.com/?p=996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Fall of 2009 I went on a trip to Deep Creek Lake, Maryland with some friends. While I was out there I took the opportunity to visit both Falling Water and Kentuck Knob. They are about an hour away and part of the same tour system. While Falling Water may well be Frank Lloyd Wright&#8217;s most well known home, neither should be missed. Kentuck Knob is a great example of how a Usonian Home could be modified to suit the needs of a much wealthier client than the original target market. Furthermore, the house is built on a hexagon base unit which stands in full contrast to the rectangle used as the base for Falling Water. When I returend to Northern Virignia I had the pleasure of touring a third Wright home, the Pope-Leighey House, a more traditional Usonian Home. While less well known, this house holds its own in any architectural arena. Compared to Kentuck Knob and Falling Water, this middle class home feels more garden folly than full time residence, but it is a great example of an early compact Modern compact home which manages to fit in the creature comforts in the smallest of spaces. Which <a href='http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2011/01/19/heaven-in-3-and-half-rooms/'>[...]</a><p>Post from: <a href="http://www.selophane.com/blog">selophane.blog</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2011/01/19/heaven-in-3-and-half-rooms/">Heaven in 3 and half rooms</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2011/01/19/heaven-in-3-and-half-rooms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preservation Matters: A Video</title>
		<link>http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2009/02/11/preservation-matters-a-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2009/02/11/preservation-matters-a-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spencer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historic Preservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Orleans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tulane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Architecture School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preservation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selophane.com/?p=438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Above is the keynote address from the Tulane School of Architecture sponsored symposium: Preservation Matters by Tulane Alum and Editor of Architectural Record magazine, Robert Ivy, FAIA. The speech is a long overdue acknowledgement of the work of the Preservation Studies / Historic Preservation Program headed by my past professor, Eugene Cizek, FAIA and a discussion of the historic preservation movement within the city of New Orleans and Tulane&#8217;s role through the twentieth century. I have to laud the efforts of the new Dean of the Architecture School, Kenneth Schwartz, who introduces the conference and Mr. Ivy. Regional Modernism has a more detailed synopsis of the presentation. Throughout my years at the school, I always felt that the historical importance of place and the efforts of the preservation program to bring this idea to the student body was too often bulldozed by a blind passion for high modernism and other international styles. Issues of climate and green design were handled in the structural technology classes, but too often they did not play a part in the critically explored design studio work. As an aside, I spent a number of minutes trying to figure out where they held this symposium. This <a href='http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2009/02/11/preservation-matters-a-video/'>[...]</a><p>Post from: <a href="http://www.selophane.com/blog">selophane.blog</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2009/02/11/preservation-matters-a-video/">Preservation Matters: A Video</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2009/02/11/preservation-matters-a-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preservation, not just for berries anymore!</title>
		<link>http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2008/12/16/preservation-not-just-for-berries-anymore/</link>
		<comments>http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2008/12/16/preservation-not-just-for-berries-anymore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spencer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architectural thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historic Preservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Orleans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tulane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preservation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selophane.com/?p=420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://architecture.tulane.edu/news/667">Tulane School of Architecture</a> is hosting a one day symposium at the end of January focusing on Preservation.  The keynote speaker will be Robert Ivy, FAIA and one of my favorite professors, Eugene Cizek, FAIA, will be providing commentary.  This symposium is free and open to the public.  If I was able to be in New Orleans, I would love to attend.
...<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.selophane.com/blog">selophane.blog</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2008/12/16/preservation-not-just-for-berries-anymore/">Preservation, not just for berries anymore!</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2008/12/16/preservation-not-just-for-berries-anymore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An open letter to the Municipal Government of New Orleans</title>
		<link>http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2008/08/29/a-letter-to-the-municipal-government-of-new-orleans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2008/08/29/a-letter-to-the-municipal-government-of-new-orleans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spencer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Historic Preservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Orleans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Letter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modernism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preservation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selophane.com/blog/?p=213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a former resident of New Orleans, Tulane School of Architecture alumni, a preservationist, and as a future architect I implore you to stop the destruction of modernist buildings in New Orleans. Ever since the Vieux CarrÃ© Commission stood up to Robert Moses and the original planned route for I-10, there has been an understanding in New Orleans that its buildings are the presents physical link with the cityâ€™s history, and that history and tourists desire to explore it and embrace it has been the economic engine that has allowed rebuilding to be a possibility. If there has been one place that preservation has failed in New Orleans, it is in regards to Modernist architecture. The city was done a historical and architectural disservice with the destruction of the Rivergate, a building that was unique in New Orleansâ€™s architectural landscape. We now stand on a precipice, the bulk of the schools scheduled to be closed and demolished are some of the few examples of southern regional Modernism in New Orleans. With their destruction we stand to lose a huge part of our architectural and cultural history. In addition, by demolishing the schools we are only contributing more waste to the <a href='http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2008/08/29/a-letter-to-the-municipal-government-of-new-orleans/'>[...]</a><p>Post from: <a href="http://www.selophane.com/blog">selophane.blog</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2008/08/29/a-letter-to-the-municipal-government-of-new-orleans/">An open letter to the Municipal Government of New Orleans</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2008/08/29/a-letter-to-the-municipal-government-of-new-orleans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Article:  Urban Renewal or Malpractice?</title>
		<link>http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2008/04/17/article-urban-renewal-or-malpractice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2008/04/17/article-urban-renewal-or-malpractice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spencer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Architectural thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historic Preservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fabric Buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Landscapes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selophane.com/blog/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Curbed has an article about an early 20th century façade being torn down in Manhattan to put up a glass box (apparently, this project has been in the works for some time, but is just starting construction, see this other article for before and after pictures of the overall building). The preservationist in me cries out in disgust.

This building is a great example of early 20th century architecture. The chicago style windows fitted between corinthian columns and thinner windows above that emphasis the vertical nature of this early 20th Century skyscraper scream pre-Modern to me. In an other time, the loss of a fabric building like this wouldn't even be a story, but in the age of historic preservation and with New York City rekindling its romance with glass and steel it begs me ask the question: Do famous buildings, like famous people, deserve celebrity treatment, or is the fabric of a city an integral part of its cultural landscape worth preserving just as much as its standouts?<p>Post from: <a href="http://www.selophane.com/blog">selophane.blog</a><br/><br/><a href="http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2008/04/17/article-urban-renewal-or-malpractice/">Article:  Urban Renewal or Malpractice?</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.selophane.com/index.php/2008/04/17/article-urban-renewal-or-malpractice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

